Does money buy votes in congress outline the relationship between Research Paper

Does money buy votes in relative outline the relationship between function contributions and voting in congress - Research Paper vitrineSpecial interest contributions can flow to politicians who intrinsically value the same policy outcomes, but the contributions may put on insignificant political behaviour once a politician is elected in office. unitary cornerstone of the argument presented in the diverse studies is the notion that campaign contributions are essentially concerned with alter election outcomes and that donations are for the most part not meant to buy votes. However, donations are used by various gatherings in trying to influence ideological positions closer to congress regarding the ideal perception for the interest group (Bronars & Lott, 1995). According to Wawro (2001), efforts to reform campaign finance laws result from the belief that campaign contributions have pernicious belief on politician behaviour with a recent survey showing that 53% of individua l believed campaign contributions influence policies of elected officials. ... Therefore, PAC (Political Action Committees) contribute to members of the congress in a way presumable for the politicians to vote the way PACs favour even without contributions. PAC donation to friendly members may be construed as cause for the members to vote in a certain way when in fact the member would have voted the same way without the donation. The extensive research on the issues has not produced consistent results that indicate that campaign contributions influence congress members voting behaviour (Wawro, 2001). Despite the common knowledge that campaign contributions of interest groups have utmost less influence that commonly thought systematic examination of literature reveals various studies that establish confederacy between monetary donations and votes. Findings from various studies indicate several significant qualifications to the common knowledge that monetary donations do in fact sw ay how elected representatives vote. The findings are however subject to variations in model judicial admission because there is less significant link in certain research model specifications such results are nevertheless common in better models. Clearly, monetary donations are linked with voting that favour the givers interests nevertheless, any attempt to conclude autonomous sway on legislators has to fully account for the complexities of the relationships involved. That of commodious importance is the propensity for PACs to give money to affiliates who are disposed to favour their position for instance, liberal groups rearwards their own associates who come from liberal constituencies resulting in them voting generously while the opposite applies to conservatives (Roscoe & Jenkins, 2005 US relation back votes on trade, 2011). The pattern suggest that it is the